Tag: Australia

Watch as Antifa cheers Hitler!

Are you afraid yet, fascist?

The progressive socialists are out holding another one of their stupid “resist” protests as a troll who deserves a whole case of beer gives them some socialist/communist quotes (Note: One thing I should point out is that I didn’t verify the quotes – some of them may be from Lenin, Stalin, Goebbels, or Himmler. Be sure to do some of your own research). Isn’t this just grand?

Honestly, it can be hard to tell when these guys are serious.





Are you afraid yet?

Dear Leader and Her Empress are angry


Dear Leader and Shillary Hillary are angry about gun violence in the United States. The most recent crime to be politicized by progs nationwide was the shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, OR. The man responsible for the killings singled out the Christians for death. When walking up to his victims, he reportedly told his victims the following after they responded to a question about being Christian: “Good, because you’re a Christian, you’re going to see God in just about one second…” Of course, we can’t jump to conclusions even though Rula Jebreal argued on CNN that: And in the realm of possibility, in a country that is very armed, that somebody, that will be carrying [a] weapon will go to a mosque tomorrow, or after tomorrow, and will start shooting people, and then these people will have blood on their hands, all of them. Carson, Trump, and Ted Cruz.

I suppose that Hillary and the President won’t talk about the religious angle of the shooting. They’ll talk about “common sense” gun controls laws. But of course, Dear Leader hasn’t actually said during his speeches what such legislation would look like. He just complains that Congress isn’t doing what he wants it to and that the majority of citizens want “common sense” gun control laws.

Let’s hear Dear Leader Obama discuss his thoughts on the shooting:

Let’s break down some of what the President had to say about this matter:

It’s not enough. It does not capture the heartache and grief and anger that we should feel. And it does nothing to prevent this carnage from being inflicted someplace else in America,

What about the carnage inflicted by Americans with cars every year? Over 30,000 people die from motor vehicle collisions in the U.S. every year. With more strict car control laws, I’m sure that the Federal Government could end death by automobile also. Next, we’ll have crime control like in Baltimore, MD.

Somebody somewhere will comment and say, ‘Obama politicized this issue,'” and “This is something we should politicize. It is relevant to our common life together, to the body politic.

At least this part of his speech is honest. Is the President going to politicize the gunman’s hate for Christians? Silly thought, only Muslims and persecuted LGBT party members receive such consideration from progressives.

The notion that gun laws don’t work, or just will make it harder for law-abiding citizens, and criminals will still get their guns – it’s not borne out by the evidence,” and “We know that other countries in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings.

Of course, Dear Leader doesn’t take the time to cite any evidence. I wonder how citizens of Chicago feel about this? In 1997 Australia enacted the National Firearms Agreement in response to the Port Aurthur massacre. There were actually “mass shootings” in Australia prior to  In the years immediately following the extremely tight (though not complete ban) gun control laws, violent crime didn’t go down. Perhaps the reasons for crime are more complex than simply allowing citizens to carry guns?


For some more data from Australia, let’s look to a publication by the Australian Institute of Criminology entitled: No. 61 Violent Crime in Australia:Interpreting the Trend.

figure 1

Let’s take a look at some of what is written in this document:

Because of the large proportion of violent crime that is unreported (that is, what criminologists call the “dark figure of crime”), the dramatic increases observed in violent crime as measured by the police may be directly related to improved effectiveness and efficiency with which the police record crime. In other words, the police may be recording more crimes of violence because they are recording crimes that in previous times would not have been recorded. Increases in police records of violent crime might reflect the shrinking of the dark figure of crime rather than an increase in underlying violence in the community.

So with better technology and better enforcement crimes are simply being reported more often? Seems reasonable enough.

Furthermore, the increase that did occur between the 1951-70 period and the 1971-88 period is most likely explained by the changing demography of the Australian population. The proportion of the population accounted for by young males was at an historically low ebb during the middle part of the century and the resurgence in the strength of this sector is the most conservative explanation for the observed change in the homicide rate.

People commit crimes, not guns. People can commit crimes with blunt objects, knives, vehicles, or make bombs with common chemicals. Crime occurred before the advent of handguns, shotguns, and “assault rifles”. One needs to look at why people are committing crimes, not just say that they did so because they had guns.

A number of criminologists have argued that it is police productivity and not real increases in violence that explain increases in police recorded violence. For example, and most recently, O’Brien (1996) examined the differences between police records and victimisation survey findings in the United States. As in Australia, it is only the police figures that are suggesting increasing levels of violence, both the homicide rate and victimisation survey findings suggest the level of violence has not changed over the last 20 years.

As stated earlier in the publication, changes in data collection and police enforcement can also affect crime statistics.

Compared with other similar western countries such as New Zealand and Canada, Australia’s homicide rate is moderate, suggesting the prominent role of socio-cultural factors rather than any particular or peculiar aspect of Australia’s policy, practice or population.

Progressives would apparently disagree with this statement. According to them, we could stop murder if we could just pass some laws.

Australia’s homicide rate increased by a third between the 1951-70 period and the 1971-88 period. Similarly, between 1955 and 1971 the proportion of Australia’s male population that was aged 18 to 24 increased by a third. It is interesting to note that throughout the 20th century the proportion of Australia’s population accounted for by this sector has been steady or falling slightly.

I’m OK with blaming rises in crime on baby boomers.

figure 3

Gartner and Parker’s analysis is important in illustrating that violence is not the result of a single cause or even a single category of causes. Rather, the rate of violence, as reflected in the homicide rate, is an expression of multiple factors and complex interactions. The pressure to conceptualise violence as the result of simple or singular phenomena needs to be resisted. Some of the relevant factors may be changing in such a way as to reduce violence while others are pushing in the opposite direction.

Someone needs to inform the President of this. I would think that a college educated man would’ve heard that “correlation doesn’t prove causation” at some point. That’s not important when you need to politicize something before you have any facts though.

This brief consideration of trends in violent crime in Australia has emphasised the complexity of the task and the inadequacy of the data. The limitations discussed point to the need for cautiousness in interpreting the rates. Certainly, and most importantly, the popular understanding that violence in this country has increased dramatically and consistently in recent years is unfounded.

Really, someone needs to inform Mothers Demand Action about this. I guess that reason and logic aren’t as important as emotion though.

Back to what the President has to say though.

I would ask that news organizations put facts forward, have news organizations tally up the number of Americans who have been killed through terrorist attacks over the last decade and the number of Americans who have been killed by gun violence; and post those side by side on your news reports. This won’t be information coming from me it will be coming from you.

Why would the President care to present his own data or evidence on this matter? He’ll get the media to do it for him. I’m sure that MSNBS will be more than happy to comply.


If you think this is a problem, then you should expect your elected officials to reflect your views. And I would particularly ask America’s gun owners who are using those guns properly, safely, to hunt, for sport, for protecting their families, to think about whether your views are properly being represented by organizations that suggested speaking for you.

Considering that the Democratic Party did horrible in the 2014 election, I think that it’s safe to say that the Republican gains in Congress were a refutation of the policies Obama has instituted and wants to enforce upon the American people. I’m still wondering what “modest” gun control would look like to the President?

Let’s hear Hillary discuss her thoughts:


Actually, is there even any point in discussing what Hillary “thinks” about gun control? She’ll just change her opinions to match public opinion or korrect progressive thinking as deemed by focus group studies.


Washington Post-Oregon shooter said to have singled out Christians for killing in ‘horrific act of cowardice’

CBS News-Obama on Oregon shooting: “Our thoughts and prayers are not enough”

NDTV-Oregon State Had Recently Tightened Gun Laws

The University of Melbourne-The Australian Firearms Buybackand Its Effect on Gun Deaths

Clock boy is more important than Chris Mintz who actually saved some lives during the Oregon shooting.

Bonus Round-If you want to get a good laugh, watch this:

The limitations of international protest

In spite of protests from several governments including Australia, Brazil and Nigeria, Indonesia has executed eight people a few hours ago. The Bali Nine were convicted of smuggling several kilograms of cocaine through the resort island of Bali back in 2005 after receiving tips from the Australian Federal Police. A woman from the Philippines, Mary Jane Veloso, was spared at the eleventh hour. It seems that those who recruited Veloso came forward and surrendered to Philippine authorities. A Frenchman who was slated to be executed, Serge Atlaoui, has had his sentenced delayed due to a pending legal challenge.

Vigil Held For Bali Nine Pair On Execution Day Indonesia Executions Australian death row prisoners Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran are seen in a holding cell waiting to attend a review hearing in the District Court of Denpasar in Bali

Of course, there have been vigils, protests, diplomatic wrangling, pleas, and once the executions finally happened Australia withdrew their ambassador for “consultations”. Brazil had previously withdrawn their ambassador for an execution in January and is currently “evaluating” its relationship with Indonesia. Australian politicians are condemning the executions in “the strongest terms possible“.

Indonesia Executions Families Of Bali 9 Duo Visit Prison Ahead Of Execution An armoured police vehicle believed to be carrying two Australian prisoners, arrives at the port to take a ferry to the prison island of Nusa Kambangan, where upcoming executions are expected to take place, in Cilacap, Central Java

I’m curious as to what any of the countries of the executed citizens will actually do, aside from some posturing. Will they sever all ties with Indonesia, Will they cut off any and all trade? Would they actually do anything? I’m very curious, but it’s not as if Indonesia hasn’t executed foreigners before. I also wonder how much some of these countries would protest against China for executing drug dealers? Indonesian President Widodo doesn’t seem to keen on granting clemency to drug dealers and traffickers…

Honestly, regardless of what I think about this, or anyone else for that matter, Indonesia will continue to execute drug dealers. Plenty of other countries will also continue executions and/or have it available if deemed necessary. If I ever do visit Indonesia, I’ll simply be content with seeing the sights. What do those of you reading this think? Is the Indonesian government (and all others that implement the death penalty) evil, or did the drug dealers get what was coming?

Yahoo! News-Indonesia executes foreign drug convicts, defying global anger

CNN-Indonesia executes 8 drug smugglers by firing squad

An attack on Australia and how to treat your slave

240DD65D00000578-2873855-At_least_13_people_are_being_held_hostage_by_terrorists_who_stor-m-74_1418608624151 240E265F00000578-2873855-A_man_believed_to_be_one_of_the_hostage_takers_was_filmed_wearin-a-40_1418607805766

It seems that in Australia is dealing with a bit of Islamic rage right now. An undetermined number of people are being held hostage by an Islamic gunman in a Sydney cafe. It started this morning, the police haven’t made too much contact with the attacker, and three people were freed.  The hostages have held up the Shahada flag. A radio host in the area claims to have made contact with a hostage inside an the assailant who was demanding to go live on the air and talk with PM Tony Abbot. In a related event a man was arrested just a few hours prior to the hostage situation on a terrorism raid. I wonder what the assailant has in store for his hostages? Hey, I wonder if his reasoning has something to do with Islam? Guess we’ll never know.

UK Daily Mail-Gunman takes hostages in café in Sydney

The Jerusalem Post-Hostages held inside Sydney café, forced to hold up Islamic flag

240E362B00000578-2873855-Scores_of_police_have_surrounded_the_cafe_in_Martin_Place_amid_c-a-53_1418607805860 240DF56C00000578-2873855-image-a-146_1418611533524

In other news the Islamic State released a pamphlet describing how one should treat their slaves. The pamphlet describes how it’s OK to have sex with your virgin female slave unless it’s the slave of your wife of course. It’s also OK to have sex with your child slave if “she is fit for intercourse“. I wonder how that’s defined? But of course, the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam, nothing at all. Here’s some more details if you feel like reading about it.

Washington Times-Islamic State hands out rules for sex slaves in Iraq

CNN-ISIS:Enslaving, having sex with “unbelieving” women, girls is OK