Category: culture

Jesse Lee Peterson VS IncesTiny and Hasan Piker

This post will be another short one to write but the videos are some serious gold.

Also, here’s why I refer to Destiny as Incestiny:

His Destiny is Autism

Destiny never argues from emotion, he’s completely logical and you’re just not smart enough to understand what he’s saying.

I’ll throw in a few timestamps to Mr. Piker’s more hilarious statements:

Undocumented citizens” 24:50

Thought experiment” on taxing employers more and redistributing wealth to “Undocumented citizens” 31:26

I need to understand what you’re saying contextually” in response to Mr. Piker being asked if he’s a man 34:30

Here comes the “no human is illegal” trope 51:29

A higher state of consciousness” from smoking pot 53:36

Muh “Systemic Racism” 1:00:00

Believing women” 1:04:58

I’m a globalist” 1:11:18

Being aggressive as a man is toxic. JLP: “Are you for just allowing the illegal aliens to come in?” Aaron Morris: “Yea.

The self-admitted beta male admits to himself that he does discriminate against “bad things.” AMAZIN! Also, do progressives believe that people are born homosexual or is sexuality fluid?

S L U T – M A K E R

I don’t even know what to say or where to start about these debates. All I can do is sit in awe and watch…

Jesse-Lee-Peterson-Adelle-Nazaria-640x481

For want of a $130…

Today’s post won’t take that long to go over, it’s just about a real winners in society. Firstly, Mr. Emmanuel Franklin decided to fake his own kidnapping to scam his own mother out of $130. The story isn’t very long and this excerpt is quite literally almost all of it:

Franklin reportedly told his mother that if she didn’t put the money in a mailbox of his choosing, that he would be murdered by kidnappers.

The mother told Sumter County deputies she received a call from her son and a man she didn’t know, and relayed the incident to them.

emmanuel-franklin-mug

Genius #2 decided to attempt to steal a commercial plane (American Eagle twin-jet) to attend a rap concert. Mr. Zemarcius Scott wanted to steal and fly a plane from Texarkana, TX to Chicago and see whomever Famous Dex is. The best portion of the story is the last few sentences of it:

Police said he told investigators he thought piloting the plane would involve little more than pushing buttons and pulling levers.

He has no training as a pilot.

In December, he was found mentally competent to stand trial.

These two individuals are true winners aren’t they?

Fox News – South Carolina man reportedly fakes own kidnapping for $130

Fox News – Arkansas man, 19, admits trying to steal plane to see rap concert

San Diego Women’s March 2019 Video Footage

The “Women’s March” occurred all across the United States just yesterday and I decided to check it out, take some video, and troll a few of the chants. I’m not even certain as to why this is called a “Women’s March” when it’s really just about leftists and Democratic Party policy views in general. I’ll have more to post up soon but here are some of the best clips. I didn’t realize that the “Socialist Feminism Movement” was a thing but now I know better. Isn’t it just wonderful to see these kind, caring progressives using their children (including infants) as agitprop devices? It just warms my heart…

Remember folks, it’s for the children:

dscf4935

The Absolute State of Progress in Canada: Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv

Today’s post will be more nauseating than most and individuals with weak constitution’s should steer clear and go watch cat videos on YouTube or something. Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv identifies as a transgender woman and posts publicly on social media about how to talk with ten-year old girls concerning tampon use, demands that women give him give him a Brazilian wax (and files “Human Rights” complaints when they refuse to touch his scrotum and penis), and flings out DMCA strikes and pathetic defamation accusations against anyone who might question his/her/ze/xer sincerity about being a woman (Yaniv clearly identifies as a man on his LinkedIn account).

JYaniv

One of the first results that you get from searching for this individual on Google is from a forum called Kiwi Farms and describes Yaniv thusly:

Jonathan Yaniv (born 12 June 1987) is a man from Surrey, BC, who says he is a tranny but makes no effort to look like anything other than a fat incel.

When incel Jonathan was studying CompSci at Kwantlen Polytechnic University he tried to create a ‘National Sex Day 2008‘ (archive). Jonathan’s idea was that with 1 million people taking part he could at last lose his sperginity.

Jonathan trooned out around 2017 by changing his name to Jonathan ‘Jessica’ Yaniv.

He says he joined a women’s gym to get away from the filthy immigrants, and is apparently racist as fuck, despite being a minority (Jew) himself.

The very first result for Yaniv though comes from a blog by Miranda Yardley and starts off just as interestingly as the Kiwi Farms thread:

Jonathan Yaniv is a trans-identified male involved in the tech industry and has been on a litigious campaign against women in BC. He currently has sixteen open lawsuits against women for refusing to wax his testicles on the basis of “gender discrimination”.

On December 10, Yaniv told Langley Township Council he was personally responsible for the suspension of prominent Canadian feminist blogger Meghan Murphy from Twitter, as well as being responsible for new policy changes on Twitter and WordPress, which have banned women and deleted entire blogs on the basis of punitive action for “misgendering” (correctly identifying sex).

Without further ado, let’s take a look at what this brilliant man/woman/xe/zir has posted publicly on the Internet:

It’s common for women to take selfies while in a public restroom right?

91C7158B-EEBB-4706-941B-DB97A36AD4C0

Yeah, those were perfectly normal questions for a woman to ask right? Maybe there needs to be a wall on the northern U.S. border? Perhaps Yaniv will attempt to strike down my puny little blog as well. Yaniv seems to be craving for attention so I figure why not give him just a little bit more, right?

 

 

 

Ariana Grande’s high-IQ thoughts on the President

joan_grande_2

The progressive celebrity viewpoint of the world never ceases to amaze or entertain me. The Yahoo! Entertainment story about Grande’s insightful thoughts is literally nothing but Twitter posts from sycophantic fans of Grande and former President Obama. Apparently I don’t use enough newspeak to know that “imy” stands for I miss you. Silly me, I didn’t realize what language and human interaction has been reduced to:

In even more vapidity from the Puffington Host/Yahoo! Entertainment a song by Grande entitled “thank u, next” is supposedly “throwing shade” at President Trump for enforcing immigration laws. The music video looks like a low-brow teen breakup song but I guess that since Grande holds some books that she’s never read on topics that she’s never studied in detail I should care about what she thinks. I wonder how many illegal immigrants Grande has invited into her own home?

My, what big-brained thoughts spew forth from the mind of a progressive celebrity:

I suppose that when you view of complex issues comes from Harry Potter novels and allows for no granularity you just know that you’re right and everyone else is a Nazi:

The Rainbow Nation

I don’t feel much of a need to elaborate on this video about South Africa. It’s interesting that even if you’re logged onto your Google account YouTube still asks if you want to view the video (and will not allow you to share it).

Here’s a random smattering of news articles:

The Indian Express-Nigeria urges African Union to intervene over ‘South Africa killings’

The Telegraph-Zimbabwe refugees flee South Africa as violence erupts

Euronews-Violence erupts between locals and migrants in South Africa

Here’s some brilliant analysis by the CBC on why there are no big problems in South Africa except for white people being racist and imperialistic:

CBC-Trump spread a racially divisive theory on South African land violence this week. Here’s what he got wrong

 

The Next Frontier of Social Justice: Trans-ageism

94dea276-e0df-11e8-bec0-c1fedb39a23e

You can change your gender, you can change your race, and you may now be able to change your age as well as Mr. Emile Ratelband is attempting to do in the Netherlands. Mr. Ratelband has taken his case to court and is arguing that his birth date should be allowed to change from 1949 to 1969:

You can change your name. You can change your gender. Why not your age?” he told De Telegraaf outside court. “Nowhere are you so discriminated against as with your age.

Everything else about our bodies is just a social construct so why not age right?

He told the Dutch newspaper that his view is supported by medical and physiological reports, saying: ‘My biological age in the medical world is determined to be at 40 to 45 years.’

I look like I’m 18, let me change my age! Along the same vein as this story apparently progressives don’t like the fact that a Victoria’s Secret executive didn’t want to cast transgender models at fashion shows:

‘Shouldn’t you have transsexual in the show? No. No, I don’t think we should,’ Razek said. ‘Well, why not? Because the show is a fantasy. It’s a 42-minute entertainment special. That’s what it is,’ he said.”

The Twitter remarks apologizing to leftists did not appease the progressives though. There is no purpose in apologizing to such individuals.

Don’t you guys know that it’s the current year?!?!

alexandra_grey

my_name_is_my_name

Remember folks, women’s underwear needs space for male genitalia!

 

 

Innocent until Guilty, but when?

I just love reading what passes for news stories as I go through Yahoo! and its various clickbait articles. The first one is by Ja’han Jones of the Puffington Host entitled: “After Brett Kavanaugh’s Confirmation, One Word Ignited A Massive Debate About Feminism.” The article is about a poem called “Scream” (what an apt description of how progressives deal with politics) which someone edited after the left smeared Justice Kavanaugh with accusations that have no corroborating evidence or basis. Here’s the wonderful poem:

54811d3923adf86d1e690c0d786023e9

From the PuffHost article:

Kaur’s followers alerted her to the alteration, which ignited a debate about how those with privilege adapt the language of resistance to their preferred narrative.

Kaur told HuffPost this week that the very invisibility her poem was intended to combat ended up being reinforced when her work was repurposed and popularized.”

I’m not really certain what is meant by “invisibility” but does it really matter what a straight, white male like myself thinks to the denizens of the Puffington Host? Let’s get some more context from the author of the poem, Jasmin Kaur:

  • When you write specifically to counter your feelings of invisibility and smallness within a white supremacist society,
  • it’s disconcerting to see white people change your words to suit their own immediate needs.”
  • I understand the sentiment of people needing to vote within the current political climate,
  • I also recognize all the ways that voting has been (and still is) inaccessible to many communities of colour.

I wonder how voting is inaccessible to “communities of color“? The article never specifies and no evidence is presented. Perhaps the author or Ms. Kaur think that non-citizens should be able to vote? Anyway, back to the article:

In giving Sikh women permission to scream, Kaur was acknowledging the righteousness of their anger without demanding they find a solution for it. She was affirming their entitlement to anger for their own purpose — intimate, painful, perhaps cathartic anger, rather than anger used solely in service of others.

The appropriation of Kaur’s words, then, invigorated conversation about allyship, political responsibility and who ought to be tasked with reversing America’s racist and sexist history.

Who took away Ms. Kaur’s permission to talk? Who said that Mr. Kaur couldn’t be angry? What in the hell is “allyship“? I suppose that I’m just too logical damn racist to understand and properly answer any of my foolish questions. Let’s read some more hilarity from this article:

There was a palatable air of hopelessness among the discourse surrounding Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation. Those who thought numerous corroborated claims of sexual assault levied against Kavanaugh would stifle his elevation to the court were stunned — albeit probably not shocked — when conservative senators cast the allegations aside and confirmed him anyway.

Wait, what claims were corroborated? What corroborating evidence was presented? The same sentence even just refers to the allegations as “allegations” meaning that Justice Kavanaugh was in no manner proven guilty right? No evidence is given in the article nor are any citations given; I can’t help but wonder why? Could it be that there really is no corroborating evidence? If you want to see some more amazing mental gymnastics on the part of Ms. Kaur and her supporters take a look at her Instagram post concerning the poem edit. It really is something special.

Our next story from Yahoo! is entitled: “‘Cornerstore Caroline’: Woman calls the police on 9-year-old boy for sexual assault.” Let’s take a look shall we?

On Wednesday, Facebook user Jason Stovetop Littlejohn shared a video of the ensuing argument, reportedly outside the Sahara Deli in Flatbush, N.Y. ‘Meet Cornerstore Caroline. White Woman calls police on a kid, saying he sexually assaulted her,’he wrote. ‘As I walked up I noticed the argument, apparently, the kid brushed up against her and she said he touched her and decided to call police on a nine-year-old child. As you can see the kid is crying and the mom is upset.

It just gets better and better:

The New York City Police Department tells Yahoo Lifestyle that no related complaint reports are filed, although according to Pix11, officers did respond after the crowd had dispersed. Yahoo Lifestyle could not reach a representative of Sahara Deli for comment; however, the owner told Pix11: ‘The woman has a history of being unwell.’ Heavy also reported that Klein, of Missouri, studied sociology at the University of Missouri and is a former actress and performer.

Oh, a sociology major huh? That explains something I suppose. I thought that progressives wanted everyone to “believe women” and “believe survivors“? Not if it doesn’t fit the narrative I suppose and only when it’s politically expedient. I wonder how a typical leftist would really like it if they could be falsely convicted of a crime with zero evidence? Derp, “Kavanaugh was in a job interview, not a criminal trial.” I wonder how many regressives would like such an argument used against themselves?

Bonus round:

I wonder if Ms. Kaur is aware of the Sikh Empire? Is she aware of the illustrious history of warfare that the Sikh people have? Or does she just sort of ignore it?

Here’s a Puffington Host video decrying “white feminists“:

Even the proprietors of CNN don’t think that Senator Heitkamp (D-ND) has a good chance of maintaining her Senate seat. Yay!

Anyway, how is your sex life?

Have any of you ever watched The Room? It must be one of the best so bad it’s good movies ever created in all of human history. Tommy Wiseau is just as bad at acting as he is at screenwriting and directing but The Room is simply a masterpiece that you should watch at least once in your life. It even seems like Tommy’s voice is dubbed over but I don’t care, it just adds to the hilarity of the film. In the following video you will see one of the most incredible pieces of dialogue in cinematic history:

Funny enough, the New York Times wants to know about your high school sex life (only if you’re a man though) in an opinion piece titled: Men, Tell Us About Your Sex Life. This is an interactive article in which you get to describe your sexual experiences with women in during your younger years and explain if/how your opinions and thoughts have changed over time:

Did you ever, as a teenager or younger man, behave toward women in ways you may now regret? If so, how? And how has that experience stayed with you over the years? *

How old were you when you had this experience? *

Have standards of what constitutes unacceptable behavior changed since then? Have you? *

How old are you? In what year did you graduate? *

What is your name? It will not be published without your permission. *

What is your email? It will not be published. *

The real kicker to all of these great questions are the Reader Submission Terms. Of course, no one would think to troll the New York Times right? Here are the terms “of note“:

  • Your Content must not be false, defamatory, misleading or hateful or infringe any copyright or any other third party rights or otherwise be unlawful.
  • We will use the contact details that you provide to verify your identity and answers to the questionnaire, as well as to contact you for further information on this story. If we publish Your Content, we may include your name and location.

I can’t think of too many men who would seriously respond to these questions other than the few  simps, soyboys and cucks that bother subscribing to the New York Times. I don’t think that anyone at the New York Times understands how large numbers of Internet users would respond to these intrusive questions. The left doesn’t just want in your wallet anymore, it wants to control what you do in your bed as well. I suppose that these “men” would answer such questions:

5Q7kgNF

2ef70647b74b4bff323151d4d16c9d03

 

Westerwaldlied and other assorted music

big_27963428_0_1024-768

I think for today I’d like to just post some nice music up.

Lyrics borrowed from Wikipedia:

German English translation
First verse
Heute wollen wir marschier’n
Einen neuen Marsch probier’n
In dem schönen Westerwald
Ja da pfeift der Wind so kalt
Today we want to march
To try out a new march
In the lovely Westerwald
Yes, there the wind whistles so cold
Chorus
Oh, Du schöner Westerwald
Über Deine Höhen pfeift der Wind so kalt
Jedoch der kleinste Sonnenschein
Dringt tief ins Herz hinein
Oh, you lovely Westerwald
Over your heights the wind whistles so cold
However, the smallest sunshine
Thrusts deep into the heart
Second verse
Und die Gretel und der Hans
Gehn des Sonntags gern zum Tanz
Weil das Tanzen Freude macht
Und das Herz im Leibe lacht

Wiederhole Refrain

And Gretel and Hans
Gladly go dancing on Sunday
Because dancing makes joy
And the heart in the body laughs

Repeat chorus

Third verse
Ist das Tanzen dann vorbei
Gibt es meistens Keilerei
Und dem Bursch, den das nicht freut,
sagt man nach, er hat kein’ Schneid

Wiederhole Refrain

When the dancing is over
There is mostly fighting
And the lad whom that does not please
Is accused of having no grit

Repeat chorus

Fourth verse
Oh, Du schöner Westerwald
Bist ja weit und breit bekannt
Echte Menschen der Natur
Von Falschheit keine Spur

Wiederhole Refrain

Oh, you lovely Westerwald
Are known far and wide
True people of nature
Of falsehood no trace

Repeat chorus