Tag: Liberal Logic

Impeach or Else

It seems that many progressives refuse to leave fantasy land so it is to little surprise that Senator Dianne Feinstein gets booed at a prog gathering in San Francisco. Some of her heresy against the Party line is as follows: “Look, this man is going to be president, most likely for the rest of this term,”,  “I think we have to have some patience—it’s eight months into the tenure of the presidency.”, and “I just hope he has the ability to learn and change—and if he can, he can be a good president.” Perhaps Sen. Feinstein hasn’t yet realized that there is no place for reason in the current Democratic Party as evidenced by California Senate President Kevin de Leon’s response: “We don’t have much patience for Donald Trump here in California,” and “This president has not shown any capacity to learn and proven he is not fit for office. It is the responsibility of Congress to hold him accountable—especially Democrats—not be complicit in his reckless behavior.” Of course de Leon doesn’t state what crime President Trump needs to be removed from office for; perhaps his mere existence and refusal to submit to the Party is enough.

The article goes on to state that the moderates in the Party are hurting it and being urged to step aside by many members. That’s exactly what they need, for any moderating or dissenting voices to be forever silenced. The article drones on about random Democrats who trying to file impeachment articles against President Trump and saves some of it’s best points for last: “Still, Feinstein does not enjoy the same freedom as many of her colleagues. She is a member of the two Senate committees—intelligence and judiciary—that are investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Perhaps she’s just trying to let the frenzied Democrats down slowly. Perhaps the charges of “collusion” between President Trump and Russia shouldn’t have been hyped up so much (besides, no one does collusion with the Russians Soviets like Ted Kennedy). This is how the article ends: “What’s more, the stark reality for any Democrat, even with a president as unpopular as Trump, is that, with Republicans in control of both the House and the Senate, there will simply not be the votes required to convict Trump anytime soon.

Who needs to accept reality right? Certainly not a bunch of crazed California progressives. As always, the comments section is full of great insight:

The last time an actor assassinated a President

Another day passes, another proud progressive shows his true violent side and fantasizes about murdering President Trump. This time it’s stoned out and bankrupt actor Johnny Depp who wants to kill Trump. Progressives need to continue losing elections and having their “ideals” resisted. I wonder if Johnny Derp here really understands the violence that he’s asking for?

The Telegraph – Johnny Depp slams Donald Trump at Glastonbury and asks: ‘When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?’

Fox News Entertainment – Johnny Depp talks about assassinating Trump

Bill Nye the Social Justice Warrior’s Sex Show

Progressives seem to be getting more insane as time goes on. For the latest example let’s look to the sad example of Bill Nye the Science Guy Sex Pervert. I don’t really understand the idea behind Bill Nye’s new Netflix show Saves the World, but this seems like a really twisted way to try to brainwash people. I suppose that Bill Nye the Loser Guy and his fellow progressives gave up any semblance of decency quite a long time ago. Here’s some of the demented video for those who are morbidly curious:

It’s not evolution, it’s perversion. How did they come up with such terrible lyrics.

The ice cream shtick seemed like a really odd way for Bill Nye to project.

The Blaze – Commentary: Can we stop pretending that Bill Nye is a science guy already?

Pelosi on Obamacare’s failure

The Washington Free Beacon really does put out some amazing videos. While the video I have embedded in this post is a few years old now I just can’t but help to post up about it. Nancy Pelosi really is a vapid individual. I wonder if she governs the way she does out of ignorance or maliciousness? Mr. Gregory isn’t even being that hard on her; Pelosi just can’t admit to doing anything wrong. Pelosi’s sophistry knows no bounds…

Be like Iceland?

In yet another debate with progressives they gave almost no evidence to back up their assertions. In today’s post, we’ll go over some propaganda concerning Iceland. According to The Other 98%:

12651187_1232938010050508_5701700537642796515_n

Here’s my conversation with Michael Campos and some fellow Sandroids:

michaelc     michaelc1   Vinge

The Reuters story Michael linked me to was the only source of information that he gave me. In it the article states that a whole four people went to prison. The statement concerning “bailed out its citizens” is not explained. Perhaps that’s what progressives call nationalizing industries? Concerning Iceland’s recovery, “strongest” isn’t actually compared to anything nor is any citation or data provided. Using data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and World Bank we can compare recoveries between the U.S. and Iceland. I bet if I watch the movie that Erik Vinge told me to I’ll be properly re-educated right?

US_GDP_by_year    Iceland GDP change by year

If you look at just GDP, there seems to be little difference. I suppose that Iceland did better than Greece.

U.S. BEA data (Excel)

World Bank GDP data (Excel)

I suppose that I should look at more than just one economic indicator though. How about inflation?

Iceland inflation    U.S. inflation

World Bank inflation data (Excel)

At least inflation in Iceland dropped from what it was in the Carter years for the U.S. How about Industry, value added?

Industry, value added Iceland Industry, value added U.S.

Industry, value added data (Excel)

I could keep going, but the idea that Iceland is a utopia or is experiencing amazing performance is simply unfounded. Was a country that just experienced a depression supposed to keep contracting forever? Have progressives never heard of the business cycle? Do progressives really think that all bad investments can be avoided?

Some comments The Other 98% received on their inane photo:

Mkroboth    shrannar     Ukristjansson

 

 

Consent is Simple!

Good evening comrades, today we’re going to watch some glorious feminist propaganda media material. Here’s a sampling of what you’ll learn from these fine videos:

  • Only men rape.
  • Only white men rape.
  • All women are innocent.
  • Sex requires explicit verbal consent from women and women only.
  • And much, much, more!

Comrades, the Yes means Yes law recently passed in the People’s Republic of California (PRC) was a good start but simply not enough progress. More innocent men must be imprisoned, social justice warrior indoctrination needs to expand, and white men must learn to hate themselves for their existence. Perhaps it’s time to have written contracts prior to any sexual or non-sexual contact with an independent witness? Perhaps we should just ban sex? I think that it’s time to start a Committee on Public Safety to figure out what to do with the evil, straight, white male.

You’ll find that numerous thoughtcriminals disagreed with the narratives presented in the video. Perhaps it’s time for the USSA to undergo a Cultural Revolution.

therironwill tremoanatehemon Capture

 

Mr. Potus Takeo cataclysmic

Ulrich supermolc Evans

noBody

Don’t you feel like you’ve learned quite a lot about sexual consent and social interactions? For any who disagree, feel free to report to Tolerance Camp.

Prog_Off

I keep thinking that the social justice warriors keep hitting full retard; I need to stop that. If you want to lose some more brain cells, listen to the feminist Laci Green. It even comes with trigger warnings, just in case you don’t know how to think or deal with reality. Is this really how feminists have sex? Is this how social justice warriors interact with each other? Or are they just devoid of all humanity and genuine emotion and choose to do nothing but complain?

For further discussion on how insipid the Project Consent videos are let’s listen to the talking deer for a few minutes:

 

Take the CheckMyPrivilege quiz now!

 

Have you always wanted to know how much of a bigoted, xenophobic, racist that you are? Now there’s a convenient quiz for you to take at CheckMyPrivilege.com! Isn’t this just wonderful comrade? This website has many more amazing features such as:

The Bill Split CalculatorNever again will you have to argue with your friends about how much the more privileged should have to chip in for the pizza because of their oppressive positions! Simply have your friends all Check Their Privilege, save their scores on the results page, and use the Calculator to determine how much they each owe! It couldn’t be simpler!

Campus Investigation Service-We can save you loads of headache and paperwork by keeping your administrative staff employed. Visit the Campus Investigations page and call today for a free consultation on how we can help you!

A link to a store that sells disgusting shirts that support the Patriachy©-We helpfully added a link to a store that sells disgusting patriarchal T-Shirts like the one worn by somebody that compensates for his manhood by building large phallic replacements and raping mother nature with them, so that you may more easily boycott such things.

It turns out that if you answer the questions with the jist of being a healthy, white, heterosexual male you get a score of 175 with the rank of “Shitlord“! Isn’t good for progressive and tolerant liberals to let you know how much they accept you?

shitlord

If you’re a healthy, genderqueer, non-working, Middle Eastern, Muslim, homosexual you get a score of -1275.

muslim capture

If you’re a poor, female, cis-gendered, black/white, bisexual teacher you get a score of -875.

female_oppressed

Let’s read some testimonials from some proud patrons:

I still cannot believe how much society has lied to me. I used to think that being a white middle-classed German with a penis was ok, and that my life was ok. But since I never identified as a male, and honestly didn’t give a fuck about what gender I am, and am slightly physically hindered by a weak terminal desease, I was so wrong. It must have been the patriarchal internalised agenderphobia that lead me to believe this. Only know have I realised how oppressed I truely am! I will be starting my blog in the next week, visit me there to witness me fighting patriarchal oppression of women and other gender minorities, please. This has changed my life, thank you, checkmyprivilege.com!

Benji

Never in my life have I ever come to the terms with the fact I was a shitlord. Ever since I was born I now realise, I have been oppressing and raping every woman I have ever laid eyes on. Only now do I realise just how oppressing I am despite being an ugly faced, disfigured, bisexual latino all because I was born a man. Thanks checkmyprivilege.com for helping me realise how oppressing I really am to all the woman of the world!

Pablo

Thanks Check My Privilege! I now know I am a fuck boy white cis scum male! 😀

ShitLordWhiteMale

Thank you Check My Privilege for affirming what I have known since 1990. As I continue on my unchecked march toward becoming a plutocrat, I pledge to prey on innocent young men to satiate my ravenous sexual appetite.

Priveleged Shit Baroness

As always, be sure to share this with your friends and aid in the re-education. Otherwise, get them some warm clothes and a shovel!

 

 

Did you celebrate World Communist Hour?

World Communist Hour all-time champion!
World Communist Hour all-time champion!

In case you didn’t know proles citizens, Earth Hour was on March 19th from 2030 to 2130. If you didn’t turn your lights off for an hour you have declared how much you hate the planet and showed your disloyalty to the Church of Climate Change. But remember, if you’re a rich Party member it’s OK for you to fly a private jet everywhere and buy a massive yacht while telling all the little people that they’re killing Gaia.

WTF-earth-hour    EarthHour_NorthKorea    37867

Perhaps we could take this one step further and live like the Proletariat does in the Workers’ Paradise of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Imagine how much electricity would be saved if no one used electricity? It would be a glorious achievement for the kollective if we just went back to the Stone Age and didn’t have so many pesky humans polluting Mother Earth.

EPA_Clean_Energy_Future_Caveman

If you were in the town of  Osterund, Sweden you didn’t celebrate “erf howr” due to worries of sexual assault and rape by young Muslim migrants people who have not been identified by the authorities.

Girls as young as 10 have been victims of the attackers, who are still on the loose, and police are warning females not to go outside alone at night.

The 14 separate incidents have all been reported in the town of Ostersund, which has a population of 44,300.While police have refused to release descriptions of the attackers, victims have described the men as of foreign origin

The council, following discussions with police, have now said Earth Hour, a worldwide environmental event involving lights being turned off for 60 minutes, will be cancelled.

Social Democrat spokesman for the council, Ann-Sofie Andersson, said: ‘Earth Hour is a good and important event, but this year we chose to have the street lights on in view of what has happened. We want everyone to feel safe.’Chief Constable Stephen Jerand added: “The police think it’s a very wise move and that the municipality made a good decision. 

‘Keeping the lights on creates security and is in line with our common efforts to increase security under current conditions.'”

I wonder what more it’s going to take for European governments to figure out that importing millions of young, male Muslim “migrants” might not work out well for their social democracies? I guess that feminists only care about Rape Culture™ when they have fake stores and narratives to push, not when it actually is a reality in some cultures. I’m sure white people will be blamed somehow though. Perhaps it’s time for racist, xenophobic, priveliged, cis-gendered, bourgeois European women to just accept what the migrants are trying to offer their body orifices? For those that require more information on World Communist Hour report to the People’s Cube for re-education.

37875

UK Express-The terrified town which has even cancelled Earth Hour over migrant sex attack fears

UK Express-Woman fights off migrant sex attackers and robbers – then carjacker strikes in triple hit

 

 

Joe Biden doesn’t mean what he says…

Schumer-Hypocrisy

So by now everyone has heard about the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia and the subsequent fight that has broken out over the Supreme Court. Dear Leader Obama is claiming that he needs to fulfill his Constitutional duties and I suppose that he’s correct. It is not the Constitutional duty of the Senate to vote on any nominee. Here’s the text of the Constitution, Article II, Section ii:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

There is no requirement for the Senate to vote in favor of, or vote at all for anyone the President nominates. The Senate has given its advice to the President and does not have to consent. Many nominees have failed to become a justice due to political opposition among other reasons. Posted below is the number of Supreme Court nominees who have not made it to the Supreme Court, 1789-2010:

justicesummary

To take an excerpt from the publication Supreme Court Nominations Not Confirmed, 1789-August 2010 by Mr. Henry B. Hogue for the Congressional Research Service here’s a description of political opposition to nominees by lame duck Presidents:

Opposition to the nominating President played a role in at least 16 of the 36 nominations that were not confirmed. Many of the 16 were put forward by a President in the last year of his presidency—seven occurred after a successor President had been elected, but before the transfer of power to the new administration. Each of these “lame duck” nominations transpired under 19th century Presidents when the post-election period lasted from early November until early March. Four one-term Presidents made nominations of this kind. President John Quincy Adams nominated John J. Crittenden in December 1828, after losing the election to Andrew Jackson.  President Tyler’s third nomination of Walworth, second nomination of King, and only nomination of Read all came after Tyler had lost to James Polk. President Millard Fillmore nominated E. Badger and William C. Micou after Franklin Pierce had been elected to replace him. Finally, President James Buchanan forwarded the name of Jeremiah S. Black to the Senate less than a month before Abraham Lincoln’s inauguration. Other nominations where opposition to the President was a major factor include the remaining unsuccessful Tyler nominations, Fillmore’s nomination of Edward A. Bradford, and Andrew Johnson’s nomination of Henry Stanbery.

Let’s look at some statements made by prominent progressive Party members:

Progressives will claim that what these individuals said wasn’t really what they said. From the ThinkProgress article No, Joe Biden Didn’t Say That The Senate Should Block Supreme Court Nominees During An Election Year:

But Biden’s full speech undermines their claim. Rather than urging his colleagues to deny Bush’s potential nominee a hearing, Biden was bemoaning the politicization of the confirmation process — hence his suggestion of not holding a hearing in the heat of a presidential election — and what he saw as Bush’s refusal to properly consult with the Senate in selecting a nominee. In fact, just 10 minutes after calling for temporary inaction on Bush’s candidate, Biden actually promised to consider a moderate Supreme Court nominee.

So President Obama is going to ask Senate Republicans who should be nominated? Based upon President Obama’s previous Supreme Court nominations I don’t think that that’s in the plan, especially since this is his change to nominate a young version of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. As I said before, the Constitution isn’t very specific on how the nomination process has to go. I’m sure that McConnell would be all for voting for another Chief Justice Roberts, but that’s probably not going to happen.

Biden made his remarks in the context of reforming the entire judicial confirmation process, which, he claimed, had been marred by Justice Clarence Thomas’ contentious confirmation hearings. “

Of course, no details are given on why Justice Thomas was a bad candidate. But hey, if the Party can make a smear movie to re-write history he’ll look like a bad guy right?

As Chairman, Biden repeatedly confirmed Bush’s judicial nominees during the 1992 election season. In the second session of the 102nd Congress, ‘the Senate confirmed more nominees, 11, to the courts of appeals that year than in any other presidential election year in United States history,’ holding hearings ‘on district court nominees every month from January to September; court of appeals nominees received hearings in every month from February to September.’

The Senate confirmed a decent number of people, but the folks at ThinkCommunist Progress left out the large number of nominations that were rejected. From the publication Nomination and Confirmation of Lower Federal Court Judges in Presidential Election Years from the Congressional Research Service:

The second session of the 102 nd Congress is particularly notable in the context of judicial nominations for two things: first, the Senate confirmed more nominees, 11, to the courts of appeals that year than in any other presidential election year in United States history; second, at its sine die adjournment, the Senate also returned more court of appeals nominations to the President, 10, than at the end of any other Congress until the 106th Congress (1999-2000).

What comes around goes around.

During most of the second session of the 102nd Congress, the pace of Senate consideration of judicial nominations dd not generate much controversy in the Senate Judiciary Committee, on the floor of the Senate, or subsequently on the campaign trail. This prompted one campaign observer to note that ‘about 100 of 828 federal judgeships are waiting to be filled, but three debates yielded not a single comment about how George Bush, Bill Clinton or Ross Perot would use such appointments to affect a generation of justice.’ While the Senate was in its traditional August recess, news reports quoted Judiciary Committee staffers as saying that the pace of confirmations generated ‘very little criticism from either the Justice Department or the White House.’ Soon afterwards, however, a news account reported that Democrats, who had the Senate majority, began, upon their return from the August recess, ‘to delay confirming some of President Bush’s nominees for major judgeships to preserve the vacancies for Gov. Bill Clinton if he is elected President.’

Who would guess that a progressive wouldn’t read all of the source that they cited as evidence? Oh well, maybe next time. I’ll post some more food for thought below. As always, sharing is caring!

The Federalist-5 Worst Responses To GOP Plan To Delay Supreme Court Confirmation

The Federalist-No, The Senate Doesn’t Have To Confirm Obama Appointees

Power Line Blog-Confirmation Bias, NY Times Style

Who is Robert Bork?

Power Line Blog-The Supreme Court Controversy in one Sentence

 Scalia-the-Original

 

Social Justice Warrior demand and human “right” #267: Racial Profiling

Good afternoon comrades, today we’re going to go over yet another glorious social justice warrior demand: racial profiling. That’s right folks, social justice warriors are no demanding that you be able to correctly identify their exact race just by glancing at them. Nothing is more important to these young Party members than racial identification and a “sense of belonging” to a certain racial group. Simply talking with people as individual people instead of a collective is not possible for social justice warriors.

Never forget folks, we need to become a society that moves past race multicultural polycultural society. No matter what, Party members must always find a way to use the Race Card© and other non-arguments like “whitesplaining” and “mansplaining” to any who would dare oppose a progressive utopia.

Watch as this thoughtcriminal attempts to use logic and reason against valiant social justice warriors. Why doesn’t this wretched fiend Undoomed understand that logic and reason are the ideals of some dead, white males? Perhaps he needs a daily two minutes of hate?

Powerline Blog-Long Live the King