Tag: degeneracy

“Praise single mothers”

Every so often I venture to and look around at the articles that are posted up on CNN.com just to look for the most inane piece that I can find. In this case it’s a non-news story entitled “Let us now praise single moms” written by one David G. Allen. Mr. Allen starts off by rattling off how he was raised by a single mother who bought weird health food, getting made fun of for “fake Nikes“, getting in fights with others kids about not having a dad, and of course being “demonstratively, the poorest kid in my school” (12 years of Catholic school, by the way).  After a few paragraphs describing his own childhood Mr. Allen starts discussing research that looks at the socioeconomic status of single-parent families, decries the lack of federally mandated paid paternal leave and claims to cite studies that supposedly illustrate single parenthood has no long-term effect on children. The first research article that Mr. Allen misuses is entitled “Growing up with a single mother and life satisfaction in adulthood: A test of mediating and moderating factors” by David Richter and Sakari Lemola and is free for anyone to view (PDF here).

Mr. Allen claims that the study found “nearly no impact on general life satisfaction” and also quotes only a single part of the research article: “supporting the widely held notion from popular science that boys are more affected than girls by the absence of their fathers.” I did something that most people clicking on this clickbait article probably did not do and actually decided to read some of the study. Here’s the Abstract:

Single parenthood is increasingly common in Western societies but only little is known
about its long-term effects. We therefore studied life satisfaction among 641 individuals
(ages 18±66 years) who spent their entire childhood with a single mother, 1539 individuals who spent part of their childhood with both parents but then experienced parental separation, and 21,943 individuals who grew up with both parents. Individuals who grew up with a single mother for their entire childhood and to a lesser degree also individuals who experienced parental separation showed a small but persistent decrease in life satisfaction into old age (emphasis mine) controlling childhood socio-economic status. This decrease was partly mediated by worse adulthood living conditions related to socio-economic and educational success, physical health, social integration, and romantic relationship outcomes. No moderation by age, gender, and societal system where the childhood was spent (i.e. western oriented FRG or socialist GDR) was found.

It seems pretty apparent from the beginning that Mr. Allen misrepresents what the research article delves into but let’s through a little more of it. The study states that their are three main methods in which being raised by single mothers affects children in the long term: “less effective guardianship“, a “generally lower socioeconomic status“, and the “missing-father hypothesis. ” This study interestingly took data from families in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) to account for vastly differing variables.  The study goes onto describe how the data was sampled, variables considered, and how to analyze “life satisfaction.” The paper described how parents being divorced for the child’s entire life, separated part of the time, and how parents who never separated affected the future happiness of the child.

figure_1

Here are a few good quotes from page 10:

However, the differences in general life satisfaction between respondents who lived with both parents for their first 15 years of life and either group of respondents reared by a single mother remained significant in all models, even when all adulthood life circumstances were controlled for.

This is the first study to show that growing up with a single mother is related to a stable
although modest reduction in general life satisfaction across the adult life-span until old age when adjusting for poor childhood SES

From page 12:

The reduction in adulthood life satisfaction was partially mediated by the individuals’ living conditions, including their lower socio-economic status and educational level, lower physical health status, and poor social integration and romantic success in adulthood.”

It seems that economic factors partially account for lower happiness, but I don’t really think that it adds to the argument that being a single parent is a better option.

The last tidbit that I’ll take from the study is on page 13:

In conclusion, the present study shows that growing up with a single mother in particular if the father is absent for the entire childhood predicts a small but stable decrease in life satisfaction across adulthood that is partly explained by lower socio-economic status and educational achievement, inferior physical health, poor social integration, and lower likelihood of romantic relationship success in adulthood. Contrary to expectations this effect was not moderated by sex, age, or the societal system in which the childhood was spent.

I wonder if Mr. Allen is intentionally lying and misrepresenting the report or if he didn’t read past the first few pages? The author at CNN goes on to cite another “study“, but this one isn’t really a study. From page 3 of 4 of this very colorful paper:

Given the diversity of families within these groups, further analysis is needed before we can suggest that living in a single parent household has a positive impact on a child’s wellbeing.

OK then, so it’s not a study but rather just a regurgitation of a dataset with no analysis. It has lots of graphs though…

figure_3

figure_4
Well, at least the kids of single parents get to see grandpa and grandma more.

figure_5

Our low-testosterone author goes on to state how being raised by a single mother made him the adult that he is today though. Mr. Allen received an “Emersonian amount of self-reliance”, figured out how to apply to a college, and some other stuff that lots of people figure out how to do on their own as well. I suppose that I’m not as “class-conscious” as our male feminist author. I don’t think that I’m going to take Mr. Allen’s lead and praise all single mothers; he makes them all sound like their heroes who never, ever do anything wrong to their children (or their ex). If you want to get one last laugh out of this guy, be sure to read his article on “Why Jeanette Rankin should be on the $10 bill.” Just for reference, she was the only member of Congress to vote against the declaration of war against Japan in 1941.

 

 

Mister Metokur watches a Cuckumentary – State of Degeneracy

I recently stumbled across two very insightful videos that she some light on where Western Civilization is at and where it may end up in the near future. The two videos that I’m embedding in this post are simply amazing and as with many such posts there is very little that I could add to the commentary. How should I even feel about what is displayed in the following videos? Sad? Angry? Confused? Maybe I should just get a good laugh out of this…

The first video is rather short:

The second video has a very unexpected ending. This one is worth watching all of the way through:

The previous channel that hosted the video was deleted but I managed to find another copy:

 

Jesse Lee Peterson VS IncesTiny and Hasan Piker

This post will be another short one to write but the videos are some serious gold.

Also, here’s why I refer to Destiny as Incestiny:

His Destiny is Autism

Destiny never argues from emotion, he’s completely logical and you’re just not smart enough to understand what he’s saying.

I’ll throw in a few timestamps to Mr. Piker’s more hilarious statements:

Undocumented citizens” 24:50

Thought experiment” on taxing employers more and redistributing wealth to “Undocumented citizens” 31:26

I need to understand what you’re saying contextually” in response to Mr. Piker being asked if he’s a man 34:30

Here comes the “no human is illegal” trope 51:29

A higher state of consciousness” from smoking pot 53:36

Muh “Systemic Racism” 1:00:00

Believing women” 1:04:58

I’m a globalist” 1:11:18

Being aggressive as a man is toxic. JLP: “Are you for just allowing the illegal aliens to come in?” Aaron Morris: “Yea.

The self-admitted beta male admits to himself that he does discriminate against “bad things.” AMAZIN! Also, do progressives believe that people are born homosexual or is sexuality fluid?

S L U T – M A K E R

I don’t even know what to say or where to start about these debates. All I can do is sit in awe and watch…

Jesse-Lee-Peterson-Adelle-Nazaria-640x481

The Absolute State of Progress in Canada: Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv

Today’s post will be more nauseating than most and individuals with weak constitution’s should steer clear and go watch cat videos on YouTube or something. Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv identifies as a transgender woman and posts publicly on social media about how to talk with ten-year old girls concerning tampon use, demands that women give him give him a Brazilian wax (and files “Human Rights” complaints when they refuse to touch his scrotum and penis), and flings out DMCA strikes and pathetic defamation accusations against anyone who might question his/her/ze/xer sincerity about being a woman (Yaniv clearly identifies as a man on his LinkedIn account).

JYaniv

Edit (25 July 2019): I’ve noticed that this post has suddenly received quite a number of hits so I decided to see if any links were broken. It seems that the previous link now re-directs you to his updated profile of “Jessica Yaniv”. Since you have to logon to access anything on LinkedIn I don’t believe that I can archive the page. Now he just looks like a fat guy in drag on his LinkedIn profile picture:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

One of the first results that you get from searching for this individual on Google is from a forum called Kiwi Farms and describes Yaniv thusly:

Jonathan Yaniv (born 12 June 1987) is a man from Surrey, BC, who says he is a tranny but makes no effort to look like anything other than a fat incel.

When incel Jonathan was studying CompSci at Kwantlen Polytechnic University he tried to create a ‘National Sex Day 2008‘ (archive). Jonathan’s idea was that with 1 million people taking part he could at last lose his sperginity.

Jonathan trooned out around 2017 by changing his name to Jonathan ‘Jessica’ Yaniv.

He says he joined a women’s gym to get away from the filthy immigrants, and is apparently racist as fuck, despite being a minority (Jew) himself.

The very first result for Yaniv though comes from a blog by Miranda Yardley and starts off just as interestingly as the Kiwi Farms thread:

Jonathan Yaniv is a trans-identified male involved in the tech industry and has been on a litigious campaign against women in BC. He currently has sixteen open lawsuits against women for refusing to wax his testicles on the basis of “gender discrimination”.

On December 10, Yaniv told Langley Township Council he was personally responsible for the suspension of prominent Canadian feminist blogger Meghan Murphy from Twitter, as well as being responsible for new policy changes on Twitter and WordPress, which have banned women and deleted entire blogs on the basis of punitive action for “misgendering” (correctly identifying sex).

Without further ado, let’s take a look at what this brilliant man/woman/xe/zir has posted publicly on the Internet:

It’s common for women to take selfies while in a public restroom right?

91C7158B-EEBB-4706-941B-DB97A36AD4C0

Yeah, those were perfectly normal questions for a woman to ask right? Maybe there needs to be a wall on the northern U.S. border? Perhaps Yaniv will attempt to strike down my puny little blog as well. Yaniv seems to be craving for attention so I figure why not give him just a little bit more, right?